10 Common Mistakes in Writing ACS RPL Reports Resulting in Rejection
Writing ACS RPL reports can be very challenging for an IT engineer. Their anxiety increases because ACS is very strict and does not accept even small mistakes.
Even those with good writing abilities make such mistakes which result in rejection. Still, knowing these mistakes and avoiding them can guide them to write an excellent RPL ACS report.
If you are planning to prepare an RPL report for ACS assessment, read this blog. We will explain the 10 common mistakes that lead to rejection and how to avoid them. So, read the entire blog carefully.

10 Common Mistakes in Writing ACS RPL Reports
1. Irrelevancy
You must demonstrate your ICT knowledge, skills, and work experience. All of these should align with the ANZSCO position you are applying for. In other words, your roles, responsibilities, and duties must be relevant to the position you choose.
So, carefully read the job descriptions, responsibilities, and roles before preparing the report. Remember that at least 65% of the details must align with the nominated occupation. If less than that, the ACS RPL report assessor will find you ineligible due to a lack of information.
It will lead to rejection.
Therefore, only include job tasks that are relevant to your position.
2. Lack of Work Experience
Keep in mind that the skill assessment for employment before and after qualification is viewed differently. First, verify your work experience carefully. If you have overlapping employment periods, only one will be accepted at a time.
The work experience that meets the eligibility criteria is considered skilled employment by ACS. Only this type of work experience will be acceptable for skilled migration points.
If your work experience doesn’t meet the eligibility criteria, your report will be rejected. ACS will assess it as ‘not suitable due to lack of work experience.’
So, apply only when you are sure your work experience is sufficient.
3. Not Giving Credit
It is essential to acknowledge those examples, ideas, and diagrams from where you take and help in elaborating your point. Otherwise, it will be rejected. ACS does not overlook or forgive such mistakes. Do remember for a successful ACS RPL Reports Skill Assessment.
4. Grammar Mistakes
Keep your RPL report free from grammatical mistakes. ACS will find you ineligible if your RPL report contains any grammatical errors, even minor ones.
So, review your report multiple times to ensure there are no grammatical mistakes. Additionally, ensure that your writing aligns with Australian English.
What you should remember is that your writing must align with Australian English.Â
5. Choosing Projects in Haste
The project you select should effectively showcase your work experience, skills, and knowledge. ACS will scrutinize your report thoroughly to ensure you possess the necessary skills and knowledge. Therefore, take your time in selecting projects. Remember, your work experience should demonstrate eligibility for working in Australia as an ICT professional.
6. Insufficient Supporting Documents
Without a signed reference letter, your work experience holds no value. While candidates often prepare other required documents such as educational qualifications, CV, ID documents, etc., they often overlook the importance of having a signed reference letter for their work experience.
Therefore, ensure all necessary documents are prepared, especially proof of work experience. Additionally, make sure your documents are organized with all important details systematically. For example, use the DD/MM/YY format for dates of joining and leaving each job. Keep this in mind when writing your ACS RPL reports.
7. Deviation From the Given Guidelines
Always adhere strictly to the guidelines provided by ACS for writing an RPL. These guidelines are meant to make the writing process easier for you and facilitate ACS in assessing your report.
Deviation from the guidelines will cause confusion and may result in rejection. Therefore, follow the guidelines closely to streamline your writing and ACS assessment process. Consider using ACS RPL review services to ensure everything is in order.
8. Being Partial Towards Projects
Avoid showing bias towards specific job details or project descriptions in your RPL report. Giving undue emphasis to one project can create a negative impression. Each project should be equally highlighted to demonstrate your skills and capabilities effectively for proper assessment.
Focusing more on certain projects may give the impression that you prefer only certain tasks, which could hinder your growth. It’s important to approach every project with equal enthusiasm and dedication, showcasing your ability to handle diverse situations.
9. Not Showing your Programming Skills
It is crucial to have a strong command of the programming languages used in your projects. Failing to do so will weaken your report. Therefore, clearly mention all the programming languages you utilized in your projects.
10. Using None or Avoiding Professional RPL Report Writing Services
Though, if you think deeply, writing an RPL report with consideration of all the points mentioned here can almost be impossible if not a professional; hence, ignore your ego and realize that you need professional help. You need to hire a professional expert for the writing of your ACS RPL report so that it may be considered with perfection and effectiveness. Not doing so can end up in rejection.
There are several benefits to using professional services, including access to reference materials, expert advice, customer support, and unlimited revisions. Seek professional help for your ACS RPL report to achieve a successful outcome.
For more information about ACS RPL reports, please contact us.